Now install an....

Keep in mind that there are at least two sides to every statement. So tongue in cheek I post these statements: :

1. "Conditions do change therefore customs and belief systems have to change with them".
2. "Educating the public makes the society better.  Society becomes stagnant and dull.  Then revolution is inevitable"

Both these statements are true.  Governments are meant to be for the advocacy of the people.  But sometimes the money speaks.  Those in the money power financing the Government taxes.  Those tax's financing business through grants or programmed alignments.  Using the education networks to seduce, quietly manipulating the fresh minds of the population. 

Once there is a big enough population thinking the way the money and government want it to many things seamlessly occur.  The populations want to know there is a balance in their lives. That their voices are heard. That both the governing bodies and the general population will be active listeners.  That their own bandwagon is travelling along the same road as bigger bandwagons.  That their actions and the fact that they believe that being heard gives them governance. Who then still believes that life is fair?

However, like the elections of America, Great Brittan and Australia  (2008 to 2010)  the combined populations of the respected countries are upholding their right to have a mind, to use that mind and to choose which path they personally want to gain more information about before making a commitment.

Technology and the Internet allow for very few unexposed secrets.  So teach the young how to work collaboratively,  use the technology, let them think and evaluate their situations, Then how to question and look for the answers.  To get ahead, just like your were shown, still means don't rock the boat or the privileges will be taken. Intellectual bribery is acknowledged. But not shown to all is how to deal with this facet of life.

Having enabled our societies to have throw away families that one walks away from now work on now to instill an ethical set of morals. One with an individual as well as a collective conscience.  People still what some of what their forbears had.  Without the past links there to be handed down, practiced, worked with and passed on again many of the skills that made populations resistant and able to individually, or in small groups, survive, live pleasantly,  have and will continue to be lost.  Simply put people want to apply the good from all worlds and generations.  Nature is a big enough challenge without stressing about which of our beliefs were fed to each of us so that our decision were making the governments objectives easier to cover up.  Are we that gullible?